For Immediate Release:

Unilever Files Motion Against Quebec Attorney General for Failure to Repeal Colour Restriction and Illegal Margarine Seizure

Colour Restriction violates NAFTA, Agreement on Internal Trade, Charter of Rights and Freedoms

February 5, 1998 (Toronto) -- Unilever Canada Limited today filed a motion in Quebec Superior Court to have Quebec’s margarine colour restriction declared constitutionally invalid, and to quash the seizure of yellow margarine from an Alma, Quebec grocery store last November. 

The motion -- for declaratory judgment, for mandamus, to quash a seizure and notice to obtain a declaration of constitutional invalidity -- comes after a year and half of Unilever’s efforts to encourage the Quebec government to meet its obligations under the Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT) and repeal the margarine colour regulation.  Under the AIT, the Province of Quebec was obligated to repeal the colour regulation by September 1, 1997, but failed to do so.  The colour regulation costs Unilever through its Lipton operating division -- manufacturer of becel, Monarch, and Fleischmann’s margarine -- about $100,000 per month due to the need to operate separate production runs and maintain double inventories, one for Quebec and another for the rest of Canada. 

Last November, Unilever attempted to initiate a legal test case by importing yellow margarine from the United States making it available for sale in one grocery store in Alma, Quebec.  In an apparent effort to deprive Unilever of its right to judicial determination, the government seized the margarine but did not prosecute, thus forcing Unilever to initiate the legal action filed today with Quebec Superior Court.

“It is unfortunate that a private company such as ours is forced to ask the court for an order commanding the Quebec government to meet its legal obligations,”  said Bruce I. Mactaggart, Vice-President, General Counsel and Secretary of Unilever Canada Limited.  “Nevertheless, we intend to pursue this matter vigourously until the margarine colour regulation is repealed, the Quebec government’s illegal seizure is nullified and our property is returned to us.” 

The motion argues that the colour regulation is in violation of a total of eleven laws, regulations, decrees, federal-provincial agreements such as the AIT, and international agreements including the North American Free Trade Agreement and World Trade Organization Agreement.  In addition, Unilever is arguing that the colour restriction violates the principles of Canadian federalism and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.    

The motion also contends that the Government of Quebec has already implicitly repealed  the colour restriction through approval of the Agreement on Internal Trade and through adoption of legislative measures to implement the North American Free Trade Agreement. 

The North American Free Trade Agreement, which is enshrined in Canadian law, refers to the CODEX Alimentarius Commission which sets a standard for food additives and food colouring.  Provincial standards demanding levels of colour which are used for the sole purpose of making a product unattractive are prohibited under NAFTA as a disguised restriction on trade.  Quebec is the only jurisdiction in North America that enforces a margarine colour regulation. 

Regarding the seizure of yellow margarine from the Alma Quebec store, the motion argues that this seizure is “illegal and null because the underlying infraction... is constitutionally inapplicable, invalid, inoperative and abrogated.”  In addition, the motion argues that the seizure is “unreasonable” since the government did not pursue penal proceedings against Unilever even though the government was aware of all the facts and no further investigation was necessary. 

Unilever’s legal opinion was prepared last fall by McCarthy Tetrault and will be argued by   Mr. Gerald Tremblay, Q.C. of McCarthy Tetrault  in Quebec Superior Court on behalf of Unilever. 

Unilever Canada Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Unilever, is a diversified consumer products company whose interests in Canada include Lever Pond's, Lipton, Good Humor-Breyers, Lipton Monarch, A & W Beverages of Canada, Loders Croklaan, Blue Water Seafoods, DiverseyLever Canada, Calvin Klein Cosmetics (Canada), Elizabeth Arden Canada, and Bertolli Canada. 

-- 30 --

  

For Information:

Sean McPhee
Sean McPhee & Associates Inc.
(416) 214-1232

Mr. Gerald Tremblay, Q.C.
McCarthy Tetrault

(514) 397-4157

 

 

   

 

Home ]

Copyright © 2004 - All Rights Reserved - No part of this website may be reproduced in any manner or downloaded without written permission from Sean McPhee & Associates Inc.  
Please report any errors to : webmaster@smcphee.com .  
Last modified: March 21, 2007